You are thinking of a person, and suddenly he phones. “Oh I was just thinking of you!” you say. ‘Funny,” he says, “I was thinking of you so I gave you a call.”

Is this ‘just coincidence’?

Jung spent some time examining if events like this were more than just chance.  He called such events Synchronicity.  

 

He first used the term Synchronicity in his papers from the 1930s. Translated from the German; 

“An a-causal connection between psychic states and objective events’.


An easier definition; Synchronicity is the simultaneous occurrence of two meaningful but not causally connected events.

 

Synchronicity is distinguished from events occurring simultaneously but unconnected in meaning.

 

Much ink has been spilled on what Jung thought was the cause of Synchronicity – did he believe there was some magic or god-like uber-mind causing them to happen?

My understanding is he was rejecting causality as the explanation for everything – A causes B causes C. In Synchronicity A and B happen together and have significance. And from them meaning could be derived. Eventually he went with the belief some coincidental events had a direct psychic connection with an archetype.

 

I had some psychology teachers go as far as seeing everything as Synchronicity.  They reject the word ‘coincidence’ from their vocabulary.

 

An intriguing thought – nothing in life is coincidence. And from everything we can derive some meaning. I find it a bit chilling.