One of the tricks in Medicine is knowing how your patient is motivated to do things – and appealing to their particular approach.
I knew a patient whose cocaine dealer would intermittently shoot at him. I pointed out if he didn’t go to the crack house, he would not get shot. I tried to make a simile; If I kept going to a certain restaurant because the salmon was good, but the waiter always beat me up, I wouldn’t go any there more.
He replied “Doc, with that approach, you are going to miss out on a lot of good fish.”
Ah well.
One of my teachers thought people fell into 2 categories when it comes to motivation……
The first category is “my type of people” – people who do things because they fear consequences. For example, I don’t do drugs as I fear I would get sick or in trouble. I studied hard because I feared I would not get into medical school.
Nowadays I go to work, take exercise, and pay my taxes etc. all with some fears that if I don’t do these things, there will be consequences. (I won’t have any money, I’ll get fat/have a heart attack, the neighbors will talk etc.)
The fellow in the salmon example is part of the second category of people. They do things because it feels good. They don’t think of the consequences of their actions. It is no good warning them their actions will have dire consequences; it doesn’t register.
I recall watching Bill Clinton’s blue dress scandal with my father. “What was he thinking of?” my father asked out loud. Well, that is the point, he wasn’t thinking. He does things because it feels good. At the time he was feeling ‘Gee, this would feel great.”
He wasn’t thinking ‘I wonder what this would sound like on CNN”.
People in both categories find the other way absurd.
Consequence-people” think pleasure people foolish.
“Pleasure-people” find consequence people dull and missing out on things.
People who do street drugs often are in this 2nd category of people. There is little good trying to tell a substance abuser ‘If you do drugs your health will suffer’. If they thought like in the first place, they wouldn’t be doing drugs. With this group, I have to use an approach that entices something good to them, like “If you stop using drugs, your ability to get an erection will come back and you could have sex again.’


12 comments
Comments feed for this article
May 5, 2008 at 8:18 pm
Maddog
Can you repeat that last part again. If I stop using drugs I’ll be able to get an erection again. I’ve been telling my psychiatrist that for years. Do you think you could call him and tell him this news.
May 5, 2008 at 8:28 pm
Mark H
HILARIOUS! and absolutely true and THANK YOU for writing about it in the most hilarious way! NOw I understand why I’m masturbating! Ooops……I meant to say, I only get envious of the “pleasure” people who “pleasure” their lives a LOT more than I ever did and still seem to have NO consequence, although I SWEAR their luck can’t continue. I identify with your reality, no doubt partly because of the Mormon background.
Sex again? Are you kidding? Without all the deranged wild fantasy thoughts drugs provide, I’ll probably never have an erection again, because simple love-making now seems rather pedestrian. I kid. It was a relief to get off the a-train I rode for a bit in my 30’s.
Dr. Spo, thanks for the out-loud laughter my dog looked up from his nap to inquire, WHY are you laughing? I see no squirrels.”
May 5, 2008 at 8:34 pm
Pink
Does that work for women too?
xx
pinks
May 6, 2008 at 3:06 am
Karen
Thanks for writing that. Seems to be the basis for most of my relationship issues - especially with my brother and first husband.
I’ll be pondering that for a long while.
May 6, 2008 at 3:13 am
Doug
I think I have a little bit of both, or more like I have one, then the other. I eat ice cream because it feels good, but then I go jogging because I ate the ice cream and fear gaining weight.
May 6, 2008 at 4:42 am
Lemuel
Thanks to you, I’ve decided to stop using drugs.
[Good post, 'Spo!]
May 6, 2008 at 4:46 am
BentonQuest
Does family placement deal with this? Are Oldests more likely to be consequence oriented? Are Youngests more likely to be pleasure oriented?
Once one has a way of dealing with the world, is it possible to change this? Or, as you say, must you learn to deal with the person’s paradigm?
May 6, 2008 at 9:28 am
Steven
Your example of Bill Clinton gave me a good laugh! In regards to Benton’s inquiry above, my siblings and I are the exact opposite. The youngest seems to have learned from the older siblings mistakes.
May 6, 2008 at 9:47 am
Bigg
I guess I’m firmly in that second category, Spo.
May 6, 2008 at 1:55 pm
Coco
Mmm….sex!
I’m more in the 1st category…
I think before I act.
The older I get,
the more cautious I become.
Hugs & Blessings
May 6, 2008 at 6:14 pm
naturalgal
I am definitely the first one. Hey, it is good to see a psychiatrist who acknowledges the bad side effects of meds.
May 16, 2008 at 7:24 pm
BID
I never realized this before, hubby is #2 and I am #1. He’s a bad influence.
I did know that opposites attract though!
Thanks!