I consider myself a broad minded physician, open to new and alternative approaches in Medicine. When I was in medical school, I was in charge of the task force for non-western medicine. Western medicine does not have all the answers, and some of their approaches/philosophies are not ideal. What we call ‘complimentary medicine’ is the primary medicine for nearly 2/3 of the world’s population.
In contrast, I am wary of treatments without due process. I worry about ‘quackery’ and con artists and ‘mumbo jumbo’. The assumption some treatments are ‘time honored’ is not good enough for me – that is why ‘bleedings’ lingered into the 1800s.
There is one type of treatment over which I can not get enthused – homeopathy.
I am the first to admit I don’t know much about homeopathy. I would be keen to learn from somebody who knows what they are doing. With that said, I have doubts over its main premise; the less you take of something the more powerful it becomes.
Can you imagine conventional medicines working this way? For example, to treat a urinary tract infection, you would be better off taking a microgram of antibiotic instead of a full dose. A drop of cough medicine would work better than the standard 2 teaspoons.
Common sense tells me a miniscule amount of anything doesn’t translate into better efficacy.
Patients tell me the homeopathic medicines work ‘different’ from conventional medication molecules, but they can’t explain why this is so.
I don’t have issue with my patients doing homeopathic remedies. I am assured there is no drug/drug interactions because so they are taking practically nothing.
When they report it helped, I wonder if it is all due to placebo effect; so much of Medicine is placebo, homeopathy may be the same.
The people who use homeopathy are usually the ones who want it to work.
I have never seen double blind studies on homeopathy.
I ‘d be curious to see them compared to placebo, and efficacy at various strengths.
So while I am open to acupuncture and phytophamacology (meaning herbals), homeopathy leaves me bewildered and wary.


14 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 12, 2008 at 5:35 AM
"Joe"
How about Homo-opathy. Is that taking large doses of something. Or is it small doses of large things? It could hurt, could it? I want some more!
September 12, 2008 at 5:40 AM
Shawn
Placebo effect is there, especially for things that were mind manifested or mind magnified to start with.
September 12, 2008 at 7:24 AM
tigeryogiji
I’m no expert on Homeopathy, but, I did once try a homeopathic remedy when I had a cold. It cause my sinuses to literally drain for two days straight and my cold was gone within three days!
So, there must be something to it…
September 12, 2008 at 7:35 AM
Greg
I’m curious as to how much of homeopathy is actually psychological in nature, much like the placebo effect.
September 12, 2008 at 7:58 AM
Lewis
But, wait….haven’t some of those homo medicines and herbs been around, like, forever? I must say, we’re not in the homo business any more around here.. But there was a time when we were seriously into it: golden seal, echinacea, astragulus, Q10 (not an herb, i know), some sort of sea cucumber juice, plus a million vitamins and minerals. I’m not sure it helped. But it made us mentally feel better, I guess.
September 12, 2008 at 11:32 AM
Pink
well…from what i understand…homeopathy doesn’t prescribe antibiotics or cough medicine…it prescribes stuff like gold tinctures and drinking microscopic bits of cancer cells
huh?
I’ve never tried it so I don’t know.
xx
pinks
September 12, 2008 at 1:50 PM
cedrorum
Placebo. Which is fine as long as you aren’t harmed by the placebo.
September 13, 2008 at 3:08 AM
zeph
Check the dilution levels. It’s all as close to pure water as you can possibly get. Reasonably harmless, but not a cure for anything more than light dehydration.
September 13, 2008 at 4:59 AM
doug
You are making me want to get rid of my handy jar of leeches. And I have grown quite fond of them!
September 13, 2008 at 5:28 PM
Merri
Ok, I know quite a bit about homeopathy, and in my experience it DOES work.
But we are all different and VERY entitled to our own opinions..
If homeopathic preparations ARE placebos, why do they work for babies(who have no pre conceived notions that the preparations will work or not)
Animals?(ditto)
Fascinating!
I would rather take a homeopathic med than one that would make me develop cancer or be at risk for heart disease…
September 13, 2008 at 5:56 PM
DougT
Nice post. I’ve noticed a lot of confusion lately between homeopathy and herbal medicine. The aisle at the grocery store that carries herbal supplements lists them as ‘homeopathy’. One important difference between the two is that the claims of those herbal medicines that have not undergone a rigorous double blind test do not require a significant rewriting of our understanding of chemistry or physics. They just need to be tested. The same cannot be said of homeopathy. The whole notion of the diluent retaining the “memory” of the active ingredient molecules runs counter to large parts of our understanding of how molecules work. And where homeopathy has been put to more rigorous tests, it has inevitably failed.
September 15, 2008 at 2:21 PM
Doug
Aren’t vaccinations along the same lines as homeopathy? Small amounts of something to get the body to react and defend itself?
September 17, 2008 at 7:54 PM
Steven
And here I thought homeopathy dealt with the smelling of different scents to relax or arouse oneself.
September 22, 2008 at 1:33 PM
Raybob
I’m baffled by this, too. But if a placebo works, it still … works.